1977 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1977 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler 160 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3510 mm |
