1977 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1977 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler 160 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rover |
| Model | 160 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 410 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
