1977 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Ford Ikon
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ikon (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 41 kg more than 2005 Ford Ikon.
Because 1977 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ikon (137 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ikon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chrysler 160 | 2005 Ford Ikon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Ikon |
Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1044 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |