1977 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 160 | Ractis |
Year Released | 1977 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |