1977 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Because 1977 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (174 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | 160 | Civic |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1785 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
