1977 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1977 Chrysler 1609.
Because 1977 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 has automatic transmission and 1977 Chrysler 1609 has manual transmission. 1977 Chrysler 1609 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler 1609 | 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 1609 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1510 kg |
