1977 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Noble M10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1977 Chrysler 1609. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1977 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1999 Noble M10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Noble M10 (220 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 1999 Noble M10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chrysler 1609 | 1999 Noble M10 | |
Make | Chrysler | Noble |
Model | 1609 | M10 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 220 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |