1977 Chrysler 1610 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 1977 Chrysler 1610 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Chrysler 1610 (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Chrysler 1610 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 5 kg more than 1977 Chrysler 1610.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Chrysler 1610. (159 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Chrysler 1610.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler 1610 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 1610 | EJ |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1981 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
