1977 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Chrysler Le Baron | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Le Baron | TL |
Year Released | 1977 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2840 mm |