1977 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 216 kg more than 1977 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2010 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2010 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Le Baron | CTS |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2880 mm |
