1977 Daihatsu Delta vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1977 Daihatsu Delta is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1977 Daihatsu Delta. (85 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1977 Daihatsu Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Daihatsu Delta weights approximately 135 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Daihatsu Delta. (123 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Daihatsu Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Daihatsu Delta | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Delta | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1977 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2210 mm |