1977 Datsun 280 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,751 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Datsun 280 (125 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Datsun 280 weights approximately 635 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Datsun 280 (197 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1977 Datsun 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Datsun 280 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Datsun | MCC |
Model | 280 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2751 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1810 mm |