1977 Datsun 280 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,751 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1977 Datsun 280. (125 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1977 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 115 kg more than 1977 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Datsun 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Datsun 280 (197 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Datsun 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Datsun 280 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Datsun | Nissan |
| Model | 280 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2751 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 197 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |
