1977 Dodge Aspen vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1977 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1977 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 275 kg more than 2004 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1977 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Dodge Aspen | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Aspen | TF |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 89.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |