1977 Fiat 128 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1977 Fiat 128 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1977 Fiat 128. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1977 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 65 kg more than 1977 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Fiat 128 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | 128 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1115 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |
