1977 Fiat 132 vs. 2004 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Fiat 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Fiat 132 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Fiat 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Fiat 132 (112 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Ford Puma. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Fiat 132 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Fiat 132 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Fiat 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Fiat 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Fiat 132 (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Puma. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Fiat 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Fiat 132 | 2004 Ford Puma | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 132 | Puma |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |