1977 Fiat X1-9 vs. 2002 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Fiat X1-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Fiat X1-9 (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Fiat X1-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Fiat X1-9 weights approximately 168 kg more than 2002 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Fiat X1-9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Fiat X1-9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Fiat X1-9 (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Fiat X1-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Fiat X1-9 | 2002 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | X1-9 | Laputa |
Year Released | 1977 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63.9 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 30 L |