1977 Ford 2000 vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 700 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford 2000 | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | 2000 | Pullman |
Year Released | 1977 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 120 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 6.3:1 |
Top Speed | 147 km/hour | 132 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3330 mm |