1977 Ford 2000 vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 843 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 1977 Ford 2000 has manual transmission. 1977 Ford 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford 2000 | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 2000 | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1977 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 81 L |