1977 Ford 2000 vs. 1968 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1977 Ford 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1968 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Ford 2000 (99 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Ford 2000 should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota Crown weights approximately 118 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Toyota Crown (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford 2000 | 1968 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Crown |
Year Released | 1977 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |