1977 Ford 2000 vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 744 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (100 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford 2000 weights approximately 252 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 840 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford 2000 | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Lotec |
Model | 2000 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 844 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |