1977 Ford 2000 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (99 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1017 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Ford 2000 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 2000 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.8 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1257 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 106 L |
