1977 Ford 2000 vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (99 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000.
Because 2009 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford 2000 | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | NP300 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1992 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 16.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |