1977 Ford 2000 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (99 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford 2000 weights approximately 302 kg more than 2010 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.

Compare all specifications:

1977 Ford 2000 2010 Mazda BT-50
Make Ford Mazda
Model 2000 BT-50
Year Released 1977 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1992 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 99 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 257 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.8 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 19.8:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1257 kg 955 kg
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 50 L