1977 Ford 2000 vs. 2012 BMW X5

To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1977 Ford 2000 has manual transmission. 1977 Ford 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1977 Ford 2000 2012 BMW X5
Make Ford BMW
Model 2000 X5
Year Released 1977 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1992 cc 4400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 99 HP 0 HP
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 7-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4851 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1994 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1763 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2933 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]