1977 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,294 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Ford Cortina (108 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Ford Cortina weights approximately 148 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Ford Cortina (176 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford Cortina | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Cortina | Clio |
Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1128 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |