1977 Ford Cougar vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1977 Ford Cougar.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Ford Cougar | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Cougar | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2890 mm |
