1977 Ford Cougar vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 490 kg more than 1977 Ford Cougar.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Ford Cougar has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Ford Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford Cougar | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Pajero |
Year Released | 1977 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4947 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |