1977 Ford Cougar vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford Cougar | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Cougar | Commander |
Year Released | 1977 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |