1977 Ford LTD vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford LTD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford LTD would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Ford LTD is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Ford LTD (296 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (268 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Ford LTD should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 1977 Ford LTD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Ford LTD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Ford LTD (525 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1977 Ford LTD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Ford LTD | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | LTD | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5763 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 269 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2340 mm |
