1977 Ford Megastar II vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Megastar II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Megastar II would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford Megastar II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 303 kg more than 1977 Ford Megastar II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Ford Megastar II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Ford Megastar II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford Megastar II.

Compare all specifications: