1977 Ford Megastar II vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Megastar II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Megastar II would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford Megastar II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 409 kg more than 1977 Ford Megastar II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Megastar II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (170 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford Megastar II.

Compare all specifications: