1977 Ford Megastar II vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Megastar II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Megastar II would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford Megastar II.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Ford Megastar II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford Megastar II. (170 Nm). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford Megastar II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Ford Megastar II | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Megastar II | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3192 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
