1977 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,184 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1977 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1977 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Ford Thunderbird | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | 6 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4184 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |