1977 Holden GTS vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,139 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden GTS (158 HP @ 4550 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden GTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Holden GTS weights approximately 130 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Holden GTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Holden GTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden GTS (326 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 1977 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: