1977 Holden GTS vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,139 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden GTS (158 HP @ 4550 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden GTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Holden GTS weights approximately 440 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Holden GTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Holden GTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden GTS (326 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1977 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: