1977 Holden Kingswood vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1977 Holden Kingswood is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden Kingswood (213 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden Kingswood should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Holden Kingswood | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Kingswood | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1977 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |