1977 Holden Kingswood vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden Kingswood (213 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden Kingswood should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1977 Holden Kingswood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Holden Kingswood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Holden Kingswood | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | Kingswood | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5042 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
