1977 Holden Kingswood vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden Kingswood (213 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden Kingswood should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1977 Holden Kingswood.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden Kingswood (400 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1977 Holden Kingswood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Holden Kingswood | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Kingswood | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 213 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2710 mm |