1977 Kia Brisa vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 985 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Kia Brisa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Kia Brisa (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Kia Brisa should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1977 Kia Brisa.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Kia Brisa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Kia Brisa (69 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1977 Kia Brisa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Kia Brisa | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Kia | Subaru |
| Model | Brisa | R2 |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 985 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2370 mm |
