1977 Lada 1200 vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1977 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1977 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1977 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Lada 1200. 1986 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 1977 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1977 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Lada 1200 | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Lada | Ford |
| Model | 1200 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1977 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |
