1977 Lada 1200 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1977 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1977 Lada 1200.
Because 1977 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Lada 1200 | 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1200 | Colt |
Year Released | 1977 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |