1977 Lancia Beta vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1977 Lancia Beta is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1977 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1977 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Lancia Beta weights approximately 85 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Lancia Beta | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Beta | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1977 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 57 L |