1977 Lancia Beta vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1977 Lancia Beta. (82 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1977 Lancia Beta.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Lancia Beta | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Beta | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3010 mm |