1977 Lotus Eclat vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 263 kg more than 1977 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1977 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1977 Lotus Eclat | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Lotus | Acura |
| Model | Eclat | CSX |
| Year Released | 1977 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
