1977 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 560 kg more than 1977 Mazda 323.
Because 1977 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 323 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 323 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1977 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1271 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2648 mm |