1977 Mazda 616 vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 1977 Mazda 616 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 265 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 265 (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 616 | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | 265 |
Year Released | 1977 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |