1977 Mazda 616 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1980 Toyota Cressida is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Cressida. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 350 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Cressida (132 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Cressida will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 616 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1977 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2650 mm |