1977 Mazda 616 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (271 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 419 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 616 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 616 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1977 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |