1977 Mazda 616 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 730 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1977 Mazda 616 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 616 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1977 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2649 mm |